On 06/12/2012 11:40 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 10:30 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 06/12/2012 10:26 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>>
>>> Instead of copying, maybe this would be much better to make the content
>>> of lib/string.c usable in a pre-boot environment.
>
>> Not sure about that... a lot of it is #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_* and you
>> *really* want those optimizations on some arches.
>
> Can __weak be used?
>
lib/string.c contains a lot of stuff that are not needed in preboot, and
would increase the kernel image size. I'm not sure if we will be able
to make it usable in pre-boot and only bringing in what is needed by
preboot, withtut unnecessarily complicated lib/string.c.
Thanks Joe for the suggestion. I guess we could remove the #ifndef by
renaming all arch specific mem helper functions to arch_<name>, and
declaring them with a weak attribute in mem.c and let the mem.c check to
see if it is provided, Here is an example for memcpy
Architecture specific,
void *arch_memcpy(void *__dest, __const void *__src, size_t __n)
{
...
}
lib/mem.c
extern void *arch_memcpy(void *__dest, __const void *__src, size_t __n)
__attribute __((weak));
void *memcpy(void *__dest, __const void *__src, size_t __n)
{
if (arch_memcpy) {
arch_memcpgoogly();
return;
}
}
But this does not solve the memmove issue. Could we always trust
arch_memcpy in all architectures? I guess the safest way would be to
use memmove in string.c. Please let me know if you have any thoughts or
suggestions.
Thanks,
Mak.
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
