On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Lasse Collin wrote:
> On 2012-06-11 T Makphaibulchoke wrote:
> > +#ifndef __HAVE_PREBOOT_ARCH_MEMMOVE
> > +void *memmove(void *__dest, __const void *__src, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + unsigned char *d = __dest;
> > + const unsigned char *s = __src;
> > +
> > + if (__dest == __src)
> > + return __dest;
> > +
> > + if (__dest < __src)
> > + return memcpy(__dest, __src, count);
> > +
> > + while (count--)
> > + d[count] = s[count];
> > + return __dest;
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> The use of memcpy when __dest < __src is OK with some memcpy
> implementations, but in a generic case it isn't guaranteed to work.
Of course, if the memcpy implementation is also provided along with this
memmove code, as it was the case on ARM before this patch, then you can
guarantee it. And if that memcpy() happens to be slightly more
optimized then this is a win.
> I think it would be better to just copy memmove from lib/string.c.
Instead of copying, maybe this would be much better to make the content
of lib/string.c usable in a pre-boot environment.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
