On Tue 2009-06-09 15:34:02, Hans-Joachim Picht wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 08:44:51 +0200 > Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/s390/power/swsusp.c > > > =================================================================== > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/s390/power/swsusp.c > > > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ > > > +/* > > > + * Support for suspend and resume on s390 > > > + * > > > + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2009 > > > + * > > > + * Author(s): Hans-Joachim Picht <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > + * > > > + */ > > > + > > > +#include <linux/suspend.h> > > > +#include <linux/gfp.h> > > > +#include <linux/cpu.h> > > > +#include <linux/smp.h> > > > +#include <linux/cpumask.h> > > > +#include <asm/ipl.h> > > > +#include <asm/processor.h> > > > > Empty functions do not need 1000 includes... > > Thanks for spotting this. I will remove these. > > > > +/* > > > + * save CPU registers before creating a hibernation image and > > > before > > > + * restoring the memory state from it > > > + */ > > > +void save_processor_state(void) > > > +{ > > > +} > > > + > > > +/* > > > + * restore the contents of CPU registers > > > + */ > > > +void restore_processor_state(void) > > > +{ > > > +} > > > > ...and explaining why the functions can be emmpty would be nice. > > I integrated the code for this in the assembly backend in the > swsusp_arch_suspend & swsusp_arch_resume functions. I guessed so. Maybe it is worth a comment? -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html