Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Martin Peschke <mp3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
> > There are roughly about 400 locks in a normal kernel for a desktop. The
> > list is rather cumbersome anyways so, IMO, it really should be handled
> > by parsing tools, etc... There could be more properties attached to each
> > lock especially if you intend to get this to work on -rt which need more
> > things reported.
> 
> Adding stuff to an already wide table in a readable fashion is more 
> difficult than making a list longer.
> 
> Do mean I might submit this stuff for -rt?

Firstly, submit cleanup patches that _do not change the output_. If you 
have any output changes, do it as a separate patch, ontop of the cleanup 
patch. Mixing material changes and cleanups into a single patch is a 
basic patch submission mistake that will only earn you NACKs.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux