* Martin Peschke <mp3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Admittedly this gives you the top five contention points, [...] if the infrastructure your are advocating does not allow us to keep the existing output then it's simply not flexible enough. Why on earth are you even arguing about this? A "cleanup" should not change the output, simple as that. Do a patch that has the _same_ output and then we can see whether it's a good patch. You made the same mistake with your /proc/timer_stats cleanups. I dont like NACK-ing patches but you seem to be missing the basic precondition of cleanups: no functional effect to the code, and certainly no change in output. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
