On Thu, 10 Oct 2024, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > > On 09/10/2024 17:29, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 15:01:13 +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > > > A few ROHM PMICs have an RTC block which can be controlled by the > > > > rtc-bd70528 driver. The RTC driver needs the alarm interrupt information > > > > from the parent MFD driver. The MFD driver provides the interrupt > > > > information as a set of named interrupts, where the name is of form: > > > > <PMIC model>-rtc-alm-<x>, where x is an alarm block number. > > > > > > > > >From the RTC driver point of view it is irrelevant what the PMIC name > > > > is. It is sufficient to know this is alarm interrupt for a block X. The > > > > PMIC model information is carried to RTC via the platform device ID. > > > > Hence, having the PMIC model in the interrupt name is only making things > > > > more complex because the RTC driver needs to request differently named > > > > interrupts on different PMICs, making code unnecessary complicated. > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Applied, thanks! Unapplied. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
