On 09/10/2024 17:29, Lee Jones wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 15:01:13 +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
A few ROHM PMICs have an RTC block which can be controlled by the
rtc-bd70528 driver. The RTC driver needs the alarm interrupt information
from the parent MFD driver. The MFD driver provides the interrupt
information as a set of named interrupts, where the name is of form:
<PMIC model>-rtc-alm-<x>, where x is an alarm block number.
>From the RTC driver point of view it is irrelevant what the PMIC name
is. It is sufficient to know this is alarm interrupt for a block X. The
PMIC model information is carried to RTC via the platform device ID.
Hence, having the PMIC model in the interrupt name is only making things
more complex because the RTC driver needs to request differently named
interrupts on different PMICs, making code unnecessary complicated.
[...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] mfd: rtc: bd7xxxx Drop IC name from IRQ
commit: cd49b605779b4fea8224650eeba70b258c5cc8cc
Hello Lee, Alexandre,
Nothing pleases me more than having this quickly merged but...
... I don't think I saw ack from Alexandre yet. Furthermore, the
(subset) makes me wonder because I sent RTC and MFD changes in a single
patch - which might've been a mistake...
I tried finding the cd49b605779b4fea8224650eeba70b258c5cc8cc from MFD
tree and failed. Hence I'm a bit unsure where we are going.
Yours,
-- Matti
