There's no need to list "s35390a" in the DT match table. The I2C core
will strip any vendor prefix and match against the i2c_device_id table
which has an "s35390a" entry.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-s35390a.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s35390a.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s35390a.c
index 2d6b655a4b25..e3dc18882f41 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s35390a.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s35390a.c
@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id s35390a_id[] = {
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, s35390a_id);
static const __maybe_unused struct of_device_id s35390a_of_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "s35390a" },
{ .compatible = "sii,s35390a" },
{ }
};
--
2.43.0
