Hello, On 17.02.2022 00:51, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:46:49 +0200, Sergiu Moga wrote: >> Convert RTC binding for Atmel/Microchip SoCs to Device Tree Schema >> format. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9-rtc.txt | 25 -------- >> .../bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9-rtc.yaml | 61 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9-rtc.txt >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9-rtc.yaml >> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > yamllint warnings/errors: > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9-rtc.yaml:20:9: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 8 (indentation) > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9-rtc.yaml:22:9: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 8 (indentation) > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9-rtc.example.dt.yaml: rtt@fffffd20: $nodename:0: 'rtt@fffffd20' does not match '^rtc(@.*|-[0-9a-f])*$' > From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9-rtc.yaml > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9-rtc.example.dt.yaml: rtt@fffffd20: atmel,rtt-rtc-time-reg:0: [4294967295, 0] is too long > From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9-rtc.yaml > > doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): > > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1593106 > > This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch > series is generally the most recent rc1. > > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above > error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to > date: > > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade > > Please check and re-submit. > My apologies, it seems that, by mistake, I used the wrong file for DT_SCHEMA_FILES and thus I did not see any warnings or errors. I will correct this in the next version. Thank you for the feedback. Sergiu
