Patch V2 has been uploaded. Please review patch v2 instead.
On 11/10/21 3:30 PM, Camel Guo wrote:
Hello,
On 11/10/21 3:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 10/11/2021 15:03:49+0100, Camel Guo wrote:
> On 10/11/2021 12:54:54+0100, Camel Guo wrote:
> > From: Camel Guo <camelg@xxxxxxxx>
> > + switch (cmd) {
> > + case RTC_VL_READ:
> > + flags = 0;
> > +
> > + switch (rs5c->type) {
> > + case rtc_r2025sd:
> > + case rtc_r2221tl:
> > + if ((rs5c->type == rtc_r2025sd && !(ctrl2 & R2x2x_CTRL2_XSTP)) ||
> > + (rs5c->type == rtc_r2221tl && (ctrl2 & R2x2x_CTRL2_XSTP))) {
> > + flags |= RTC_VL_DATA_INVALID;
> > + }
> > + if (ctrl2 & R2x2x_CTRL2_VDET)
> > + flags |= RTC_VL_ACCURACY_LOW;
>
> Shouldn't that be RTC_VL_BACKUP_LOW?
Some drivers (e.g: rv3029_ioctl and rv8803_ioctl) use RTC_VL_ACCURACY_LOW,
but some other drivers (e.g: abx80x_ioctl, pcf2127_rtc_ioctl and
pcf8523_rtc_ioctl) use RTC_VL_BACKUP_LOW instead. Is there any guideline or
document telling the differences between them?
RTC_VL_BACKUP_LOW: The backup voltage is low
RTC_VL_ACCURACY_LOW: the primary or backup voltage is low, temperature
compensation (or similar) has stopped
Then I agree that we should go for RTC_VL_BACKUP_LOW.
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
