On 10/11/2021 15:03:49+0100, Camel Guo wrote: > > On 10/11/2021 12:54:54+0100, Camel Guo wrote: > > > From: Camel Guo <camelg@xxxxxxxx> > > > + switch (cmd) { > > > + case RTC_VL_READ: > > > + flags = 0; > > > + > > > + switch (rs5c->type) { > > > + case rtc_r2025sd: > > > + case rtc_r2221tl: > > > + if ((rs5c->type == rtc_r2025sd && !(ctrl2 & R2x2x_CTRL2_XSTP)) || > > > + (rs5c->type == rtc_r2221tl && (ctrl2 & R2x2x_CTRL2_XSTP))) { > > > + flags |= RTC_VL_DATA_INVALID; > > > + } > > > + if (ctrl2 & R2x2x_CTRL2_VDET) > > > + flags |= RTC_VL_ACCURACY_LOW; > > > > Shouldn't that be RTC_VL_BACKUP_LOW? > > Some drivers (e.g: rv3029_ioctl and rv8803_ioctl) use RTC_VL_ACCURACY_LOW, > but some other drivers (e.g: abx80x_ioctl, pcf2127_rtc_ioctl and > pcf8523_rtc_ioctl) use RTC_VL_BACKUP_LOW instead. Is there any guideline or > document telling the differences between them? > RTC_VL_BACKUP_LOW: The backup voltage is low RTC_VL_ACCURACY_LOW: the primary or backup voltage is low, temperature compensation (or similar) has stopped -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com