Re: [PATCH] rtc: pcf8523: rename REG_OFFSET register

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/8/21 5:24 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 06/06/2021 09:24:23-0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> REG_OFFSET is defined both here and in arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/, which
>> causes a build warning, so rename this macro in the RTC driver.
>>
>> ../drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c:44: warning: "REG_OFFSET" redefined
>>    44 | #define REG_OFFSET   0x0e
>>
>> ../arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/platform.h:25: note: this is the location of the previous definition
>>    25 | #define REG_OFFSET 3
>>
>> Fixes: bc3bee025272 ("rtc: pcf8523: add support for trimming the RTC oscillator")
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-rtc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>>  drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c |    6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- linux-next-20210604.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c
>> +++ linux-next-20210604/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
>>  #define REG_WEEKDAY_ALARM	0x0d
>>  #define ALARM_DIS BIT(7)
>>  
>> -#define REG_OFFSET   0x0e
>> +#define REG_OFFSET_TUNE   0x0e /* offset register is used for tuning */
> 
> All the other defines are using the names from the datasheet, probably
> ixp4xx should be fixed instead?

That would be something like 25 changes in 14 files instead
of 3 changes in one file.

But for both locations, names like REG_OFFSET are just too generic.
They should be more specific so that name clashes won't happen.

-- 
~Randy




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux