Re: [PATCH] rtc: pcf8523: rename REG_OFFSET register

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/06/2021 09:24:23-0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> REG_OFFSET is defined both here and in arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/, which
> causes a build warning, so rename this macro in the RTC driver.
> 
> ../drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c:44: warning: "REG_OFFSET" redefined
>    44 | #define REG_OFFSET   0x0e
> 
> ../arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/platform.h:25: note: this is the location of the previous definition
>    25 | #define REG_OFFSET 3
> 
> Fixes: bc3bee025272 ("rtc: pcf8523: add support for trimming the RTC oscillator")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-rtc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-next-20210604.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c
> +++ linux-next-20210604/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
>  #define REG_WEEKDAY_ALARM	0x0d
>  #define ALARM_DIS BIT(7)
>  
> -#define REG_OFFSET   0x0e
> +#define REG_OFFSET_TUNE   0x0e /* offset register is used for tuning */

All the other defines are using the names from the datasheet, probably
ixp4xx should be fixed instead?


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux