On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 18:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 16:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that printing > > > its content field by field. > > > > > > In this series I introduce %pt[dt][rv] specifier to make life a bit > > > easier. [] > > > Most of the users currently are RTC drivers, thus the patch series is > > > assumed to go via RTC tree. > > > > What I wonder about this series is how much > > larger it makes a typical kernel and how > > often multiple rtc clocks are built for a > > single kernel? > > We may hide it under CONFIG_RTC_??? if we want to reduce kernel for > non RTC cases. Depends whether it is for rtc_time only > > What is the size impact on an embedded kernel > > that uses a single rtc driver? > > I would You would what?
