Re: Alternative to updating has_smi_counter?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Rodrigo Queiro <rodrigoq@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Alternative to updating has_smi_counter?
From: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:01:05 +0000
Cc: linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAMnS4ZALUHVuH7YAGNA1+A8n7Tc+pLpso0Ywr4Z39UcC4g6e5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMnS4ZDigjkexNdJT3ZhLcmAMeodTKsPi+b91sSjE5sky7ZfqQ@mail.gmail.com> <7f10669d-fffa-40f1-86e2-db3033957b19@redhat.com> <CAMnS4ZALUHVuH7YAGNA1+A8n7Tc+pLpso0Ywr4Z39UcC4g6e5w@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 12/03/2024 10:43 am, Rodrigo Queiro wrote:

Thanks! Are you aware of a complete beginners guide on how to send
changes for review? I'm afraid I've only used the GitHub or
company-internal workflows, so I'm not sure how to submit the attached
change.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.htmlmay be helpful.


[snip]

References:
- Alternative to updating has_smi_counter?
  - From: Rodrigo Queiro
- Re: Alternative to updating has_smi_counter?
  - From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
- Re: Alternative to updating has_smi_counter?
  - From: Rodrigo Queiro

Prev by Date: [PATCH] Support --smi on newer processors
Next by Date: [ANNOUNCE] 5.4.271-rt89
Previous by thread: Re: Alternative to updating has_smi_counter?
Next by thread: Automating console_blast.sh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [RT Stable] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux