Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] tcp/dcpp: Un-pin tw_timer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/02/24 18:42, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 6:38 PM Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hm so that would indeed prevent a concurrent inet_twsk_schedule() from
>> re-arming the timer, but in case the calls are interleaved like so:
>>
>>                              tcp_time_wait()
>>                                inet_twsk_hashdance()
>>   inet_twsk_deschedule_put()
>>     timer_shutdown_sync()
>>                                inet_twsk_schedule()
>>
>> inet_twsk_hashdance() will have left the refcounts including a count for
>> the timer, and we won't arm the timer to clear it via the timer callback
>> (via inet_twsk_kill()) - the patch in its current form relies on the timer
>> being re-armed for that.
>>
>> I don't know if there's a cleaner way to do this, but we could catch that
>> in inet_twsk_schedule() and issue the inet_twsk_kill() directly if we can
>> tell the timer has been shutdown:
>> ---
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
>> index 61a053fbd329c..c272da5046bb4 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
>> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ void inet_twsk_deschedule_put(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw)
>>          * have already gone through {tcp,dcpp}_time_wait(), and we can safely
>>          * call inet_twsk_kill().
>>          */
>> -       if (del_timer_sync(&tw->tw_timer))
>> +       if (timer_shutdown_sync(&tw->tw_timer))
>>                 inet_twsk_kill(tw);
>>         inet_twsk_put(tw);
>>  }
>> @@ -267,6 +267,10 @@ void __inet_twsk_schedule(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, int timeo, bool rearm)
>>                                                      LINUX_MIB_TIMEWAITED);
>>                 BUG_ON(mod_timer(&tw->tw_timer, jiffies + timeo));
>
> Would not a shutdown timer return a wrong mod_timer() value here ?
>
> Instead of BUG_ON(), simply release the refcount ?
>

Unfortunately a shutdown timer would return the same as a non-shutdown one:

 * Return:
 * * %0 - The timer was inactive and started or was in shutdown
 *	  state and the operation was discarded

and now that you've pointed this out, I realize it's racy to check the
state of the timer after the mod_timer():

  BUG_ON(mod_timer(&tw->tw_timer, jiffies + timeo));
                                                        inet_twsk_deschedule_put()
                                                          timer_shutdown_sync()
                                                          inet_twsk_kill()
  if (!tw->tw_timer.function)
    inet_twsk_kill()


I've looked into messing about with the return values of mod_timer() to get
the info that the timer was shutdown, but the only justification for this
is that here we rely on the timer_base lock to serialize
inet_twsk_schedule() vs inet_twsk_deschedule_put().

AFAICT the alternative is adding local serialization like so, which I'm not
the biggest fan of but couldn't think of a neater approach:
---
diff --git a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
index f28da08a37b4e..39bb0c148d4ee 100644
--- a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ struct inet_timewait_sock {
 	struct timer_list	tw_timer;
 	struct inet_bind_bucket	*tw_tb;
 	struct inet_bind2_bucket	*tw_tb2;
+	struct spinlock      tw_timer_lock;
 };
 #define tw_tclass tw_tos
 
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
index 61a053fbd329c..2471516f9c61d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
@@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ struct inet_timewait_sock *inet_twsk_alloc(const struct sock *sk,
 		atomic64_set(&tw->tw_cookie, atomic64_read(&sk->sk_cookie));
 		twsk_net_set(tw, sock_net(sk));
 		timer_setup(&tw->tw_timer, tw_timer_handler, 0);
+		spin_lock_init(&tw->tw_timer_lock);
 		/*
 		 * Because we use RCU lookups, we should not set tw_refcnt
 		 * to a non null value before everything is setup for this
@@ -227,8 +228,11 @@ void inet_twsk_deschedule_put(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw)
 	 * have already gone through {tcp,dcpp}_time_wait(), and we can safely
 	 * call inet_twsk_kill().
 	 */
-	if (del_timer_sync(&tw->tw_timer))
+	spin_lock(&tw->tw_timer_lock);
+	if (timer_shutdown_sync(&tw->tw_timer))
 		inet_twsk_kill(tw);
+	spin_unlock(&tw->tw_timer_lock);
+
 	inet_twsk_put(tw);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_twsk_deschedule_put);
@@ -262,11 +266,25 @@ void __inet_twsk_schedule(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, int timeo, bool rearm)
 
 	if (!rearm) {
 		bool kill = timeo <= 4*HZ;
+		bool pending;
 
 		__NET_INC_STATS(twsk_net(tw), kill ? LINUX_MIB_TIMEWAITKILLED :
 						     LINUX_MIB_TIMEWAITED);
+		spin_lock(&tw->tw_timer_lock);
 		BUG_ON(mod_timer(&tw->tw_timer, jiffies + timeo));
+		pending = timer_pending(&tw->tw_timer);
 		refcount_inc(&tw->tw_dr->tw_refcount);
+
+		/*
+		 * If the timer didn't become pending under tw_timer_lock, then
+		 * it means it has been shutdown by inet_twsk_deschedule_put()
+		 * prior to this invocation. All that remains is to clean up the
+		 * timewait.
+		 */
+		if (!pending)
+			inet_twsk_kill(tw);
+
+		spin_unlock(&tw->tw_timer_lock);
 	} else {
 		mod_timer_pending(&tw->tw_timer, jiffies + timeo);
 	}






[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux