Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] tcp/dcpp: Un-pin tw_timer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:57 AM Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The TCP timewait timer is proving to be problematic for setups where scheduler
> CPU isolation is achieved at runtime via cpusets (as opposed to statically via
> isolcpus=domains).
>

...

>  void inet_twsk_deschedule_put(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw)
>  {
> +       /* This can race with tcp_time_wait() and dccp_time_wait(), as the timer
> +        * is armed /after/ adding it to the hashtables.
> +        *
> +        * If this is interleaved between inet_twsk_hashdance() and inet_twsk_put(),
> +        * then this is a no-op: the timer will still end up armed.
> +        *
> +        * Conversely, if this successfully deletes the timer, then we know we
> +        * have already gone through {tcp,dcpp}_time_wait(), and we can safely
> +        * call inet_twsk_kill().
> +        */
>         if (del_timer_sync(&tw->tw_timer))
>                 inet_twsk_kill(tw);

I really do not think adding a comment will prevent races at netns dismantle.

We need to make sure the timer is not rearmed, we want to be absolutely
sure that after inet_twsk_purge() we have no pending timewait sockets,
otherwise UAF will happen on the netns structures.

I _think_ that you need timer_shutdown_sync() here, instead of del_timer_sync()





[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux