On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, Tomas Glozar wrote:
> If --measurement-run-on-isolcpus is enabled, add isolated CPUs to the
> cpumask for the case when --measurement-cpulist is not specified. If
> both options are specified, display a warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> rteval/modules/measurement/cyclictest.py | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rteval/modules/measurement/cyclictest.py b/rteval/modules/measurement/cyclictest.py
> index ace8db4..4d7fcf2 100644
> --- a/rteval/modules/measurement/cyclictest.py
> +++ b/rteval/modules/measurement/cyclictest.py
> @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ class Cyclictest(rtevalModulePrototype):
> self.__cpus = []
> self.__cyclicdata = {}
> self.__sparse = False
> + self.__run_on_isolcpus = bool(self.__cfg.setdefault('run-on-isolcpus', False))
>
> if self.__cfg.cpulist:
> self.__cpulist = self.__cfg.cpulist
> @@ -224,14 +225,21 @@ class Cyclictest(rtevalModulePrototype):
> self.__cpulist = collapse_cpulist(self.__cpus)
> self.__cpus = [str(c) for c in self.__cpus]
> self.__sparse = True
> + if self.__run_on_isolcpus:
> + self._log(Log.WARN, "ignoring --measurement-run-on-isolcpus, since cpulist is specified")
> else:
> self.__cpus = SysTopology().online_cpus_str()
> # Get the cpuset from the environment
> cpuset = os.sched_getaffinity(0)
> # Convert the elements to strings
> cpuset = [str(c) for c in cpuset]
> - # Only include cpus that are in the cpuset
> - self.__cpus = [c for c in self.__cpus if c in cpuset]
> + # Get isolated CPU list
> + isolcpus = [str(c) for c in SysTopology().isolated_cpus()]
> + # Only include cpus that are in the cpuset and isolated CPUs if run_on_isolcpus is enabled
> + self.__cpus = [c for c in self.__cpus if c in cpuset or self.__run_on_isolcpus and c in isolcpus]
> + if self.__run_on_isolcpus:
> + self.__sparse = True
> + self.__cpulist = collapse_cpulist(self.__cpus)
>
> # Sort the list of cpus to align with the order reported by cyclictest
> self.__cpus.sort(key=int)
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>
Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
I'm including this but we might need to finess the model.
Right now this is the intersection of isolated cpus plus the mask if
given.
Other possibilities would be for the mask to override the isolated cpus,
but perhaps we want the user to indicate, are we adding to the isolated
cpus to include more cpus, are we subtracing, etc
