Re: Unfair qspinlocks on ARM64 without LSE atomics => 3ms delay in interrupt handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-04-27 15:45:09 [+0200], Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> > Are we aware of other concrete case where it bites? Even with just
> > "normal" contented spin_lock usage?
> 
> Well, some years ago I've observed a similar problem with ARM64
> spinlocks, cpu_relax() and retry loops (in the futex code). It also
> generated latency spikes up to 2-3ms. Back then, it was easily
> reproducible using stress-ng --ptrace 4.

That was fixed by
	https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/1399528508-2806-1-git-send-email-arjun.kv@xxxxxxxxxxx

if my memory serves me well.

> Thanks,
> Kurt

Sebastian



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux