Re: Unfair qspinlocks on ARM64 without LSE atomics => 3ms delay in interrupt handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Why is this interrupt handling specific? Just because it's the place
> where you observed it?
Yes.

> So if that helps, then this needs to be addressed globaly and not with
> some crude hack in the interrupt handling code.
I just wrote, what helps for me. I didn't mean it as a proposal for merge.
Sorry for confusion.

I tried using Will's cpu_relax() implementation [1] everywhere but I was not 
successful with that yet. ARM64's VDSO makes it complicating and even
if I left original cpu_relax() just in VDSO, Linux did not boot for me.

Thank you all!

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20170728092831.GA24839@xxxxxxx/

Zdenek Bouska

--
Siemens, s.r.o
Siemens Advanta Development



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux