On 2023-01-06 15:52:57 [+0100], Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Just so I don't get this wrong, since the cpuidle-psci also calls > > pm_runtime_* functions so it isn't PREEMPT_RT safe, at least not yet? > > You are correct. Patch 3 here addresses it by... just not doing runtime > PM. This is a hacky workaround but: > 1. I don't have any other idea, > 2. It's not a big problem because RT systems are not supposed to have > any CPU idle (one of first things during RT system tuning is to disable > cpuidle). so you say you use idle=poll instead? > Best regards, > Krzysztof Sebastian
