On Tue, 2022-12-13 at 15:41 -0500, John Kacur wrote: > One more thing that we just saw, if you run oslat without any options, > just the defaults you get 32 buckets with the highest one being 32us > > But if you run > oslat -W 500 > > You still get 32 buckets but since the width is half, then largest bucket > is 32us > > This increases the resolution of the buckets, but it puts all the overflow > in the 16us buckets, wondering if we should double the number of buckets > so that the largest one is still 32us ? > > I realize you could do > oslat -b 64 -W 500 > to achieve that, but perhaps the default is not good like this. Sounds reasonable. -Scott
