Re: PREEMPT_RT benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michel Macena Oliveira wrote:
> Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > [ again, no top-posting please... ]
...
> >
> >
> > Well, if you do it for the benchmark, but not for production, then of
> > course, the benchmark is meaningless.
>
> Then in case of a RT application for production I should "live" with
> this problem?
>

Well, you should have an over-all realtime strategy for your product.

This includes thermal requirements for both CPU (communicated with the
provider, due to the possible removal of power-saving support in SW) and
system enclosure... then you know if you can "live with it" or not.

> > If you're interested, I presented a small talk about the topic here:
> > https://linutronix.de/PDF/Realtime_and_graphics-acontradiction2021.pdf
>
> Thanks, really helpful, but if I understand, in your application
> you've used Intel CAT to mitigate the latency and plan to use Intel
> MBA as well. Is that true?

Sorry for being picky, but this was part of another e-mail sub-thread.
You should've kept it there...

Anyway, the answer to your question is yes. You need to talk to Intel
for MBA support on non-Xeon CPUs though, as the instructions are only
available under an NDA. I cannot comment further on this.

Good luck,

--
Ahmed S. Darwish
Linutronix GmbH



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux