Re: PREEMPT_RT benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ahmed,
thanks for the answer!
Do you know if it would be valid for GTK interface applications?

Michel

Em qui., 11 de mar. de 2021 às 09:58, Ahmed S. Darwish
<a.darwish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:07:47PM -0300, Michel Macena Oliveira wrote:
> >
> > I'm currently developing a time benchmark application where I want
> > to measure a real time thread latency. My application is based on
> > Cyclictest from
> > the rt-tests suit.
> ...
> >
> > I programmed in such way that it would be equivalent to Cyclict test
> >
> ...
> >
> > At least that's what I expected, but my latencies are much bigger than
> > Cyclictest ones.
> >
>
> I don't know the nature of the "time benchmark" application you are
> writing.
>
> Just a small hint that if you're doing any heavy OpenGL graphics within
> that application, the latency can shoot up significantly. On some of our
> Intel boxes, this can lead to an increase of 100-200 microseconds.
>
> That's because since Intel Gen9+ GPUs, Intel shares the Last-Level Cache
> (and thus also memory bandwidth) between the GPU and the CPU. This
> benefits graphical applications, but hurts predicatbility significantly.
>
> Good luck,
>
> --
> Ahmed S. Darwish
> Linutronix GmbH




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux