Re: PREEMPT_RT benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021-03-11, Daniel Wagner <wagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10.03.21 21:07, Michel Macena Oliveira wrote:
>> At least that's what I expected, but my latencies are much bigger than
>> Cyclictest ones.
>>  From cyclictest I get an average in my computer of  something between
>> 2300 and 2500 nanoseconds.  However, in my application I'm having
>> something between 47000 and 55000 nanoseconds. As you can see it is
>> much higher!
>> 
>> I'm not sure of what I'm doing wrong, could you help or suggest something?
>
> Check if your system uses power managment. cyclictest disables the power 
> management by using the /dev/cpu_dma_latency API.

In addition, avoid file I/O in your real-time thread. Store your
calculations in a variable and let another thread read it and write to
disk. Then it would be more "equivalent to Cyclict test".

John Ogness



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux