Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix for machines without numa

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:

> Hi John,
> 
> On Mon Feb 22 2021, John Kacur wrote:
> > Trying to return the code to a state where numa is required at compile
> > time but not at runtime
> >
> > - The first patch should allow cyclictest to run on a machine
> > without numa.
> >
> > - The second patch is a clean-up of some old code
> >
> > The code is pushed in git to branch unstable/devel/no-numa-runtime
> > so that people can test before I integrate the code back in the main
> > branch
> 
> arm32 seems to work fine.
> 
> Tested-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> # arm32
> 
> Thanks,
> Kurt
> 

Thanks, I added your tested by and merged all the changes into
unstable/devel/latest

John



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux