Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix for machines without numa

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi John,

On Mon Feb 22 2021, John Kacur wrote:
> Trying to return the code to a state where numa is required at compile
> time but not at runtime
>
> - The first patch should allow cyclictest to run on a machine
> without numa.
>
> - The second patch is a clean-up of some old code
>
> The code is pushed in git to branch unstable/devel/no-numa-runtime
> so that people can test before I integrate the code back in the main
> branch

arm32 seems to work fine.

Tested-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> # arm32

Thanks,
Kurt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux