On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, John Kacur wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, Daniel Wagner wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:59:29PM -0500, John Kacur wrote: > > > Are you really telling me you won't fix a problem you introduced unless > > > I first take all the other code you would like to get in rt-tests? > > > > I've already done the long option support in the JSON series. It would > > make my life way simpler if those bits would be in the tree. > > > > I think, the simplest fix for now is to temporarily a local fix for > > oslat. > > > > Just add a fix onto for the oslat problem on the end of your series > I'll be done the review soon. > > If we need to do any backporting then we'll do that. > > Cheers, Thanks > > John > I rewound your patches in git, and applied the two oslat fixes and reapplied your patches with a git interactive rebase, and then I pushed them for others to try before I'm ready to push them upstream Anyone who wants to try the new json stuff it's in a branch called unstable/devel/rt-numa-json The numa changes need more testing before integrate them, but this should make it easier for others to try it out. John
