On 2020-04-23 16:31:55 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
…
> Replacing local_irq_save()/bh_lock_sock() by spin_lock_bh() keeps the semantics
> and does the right thing under PREEMPT_RT.
Nope. The irq-off was introduced in commit
fad003b6c8e3d ("Bluetooth: Fix inconsistent lock state with RFCOMM")
It doesn't look right. Could you please revert that commit and check if
lockdep still complains?
Sebastian
