Re: [PATCH RT 19/25] userfaultfd: Use a seqlock instead of seqcount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:03:17 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2020-02-21 15:24:47 [-0600], zanussi@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 stable review patch.
> > If anyone has any objections, please let me know.  
> 
> This is required but it is not part of the next "higher" tree
> (v4.19-RT). Which means if someone moves from v4.14-RT to the next tree
> (v4.19-RT in this case) that someone would have the bug again.
> 
> Could you please wait with such patches or did the I miss the v4.19-RT
> tree with this change?
> 

No, I'm just behind in backporting patches.

We need to work on synchronizing better what gets backported. :-/

-- Steve



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux