Re: [PATCH RT 19/25] userfaultfd: Use a seqlock instead of seqcount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-02-21 15:24:47 [-0600], zanussi@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 stable review patch.
> If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

This is required but it is not part of the next "higher" tree
(v4.19-RT). Which means if someone moves from v4.14-RT to the next tree
(v4.19-RT in this case) that someone would have the bug again.

Could you please wait with such patches or did the I miss the v4.19-RT
tree with this change?

Sebastian



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux