On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:43:40 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On (01/16/19 11:07), Petr Mladek wrote: > > The patch makes perfect sense. But it is not ready for upstream > > because CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is not there yet. Do I get it > > correctly, please? > > Yes. Hence Cc linux-rt-users. > > Actually it's the Subject line. We use "[PATCH RT]" to denote changes caused by PREEMPT_RT existing. -- Steve
