On 2019-01-15 12:39:10 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c > @@ -1742,6 +1742,13 @@ static int console_trylock_spinning(void) > if (console_trylock()) > return 1; > > + /* > + * The consoles are preemptable in PREEMPT_RT, which can cause > + * spinning to deadlock. > + */ > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL)) > + return 0; > + > printk_safe_enter_irqsave(flags); > > raw_spin_lock(&console_owner_lock); So my ("printk: Make rt aware") patch does: diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c index 6553508ff3889..d983c509f74a2 100644 --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c @@ -1617,6 +1617,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(syslog, int, type, char __user *, buf, int, len) return do_syslog(type, buf, len, SYSLOG_FROM_READER); } +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL /* * Special console_lock variants that help to reduce the risk of soft-lockups. * They allow to pass console_lock to another printk() call using a busy wait. @@ -1757,6 +1758,15 @@ static int console_trylock_spinning(void) return 1; } +#else + +static int console_trylock_spinning(void) +{ + return console_trylock(); +} + +#endif + /* * Call the console drivers, asking them to write out * log_buf[start] to log_buf[end - 1]. So it never gets into the codepath where you try to avoid spinning. Right? Sebastian