Re: PREEMPT_RT and i915

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-12-06 11:28:49 [+0100], Luca Abeni wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Luca,

> BTW, I tried to search for some document explaining what to enable and
> what to disable in .config in order to get a well-performing RT
> kernel, but I did not find anything useful... Does anyone have
> recommendations about documents to read for correctly configuring a
> PREEMPT_RT kernel?

The obvious part is almost everything under "kernel hacking". So tracing
hardly adds any overhead if not in use.
CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC should have less overhead compared to the NO_HZ
versions. Usually you do something in a loop and a CPU hardly get idle.

> Thanks for the patch! I am going to try it immediately.
> BTW, playing with some options I discovered that if I add "nohz=off"
> to the kernel commandline I get a maximum latency of about 150us when
> using the i915 driver, and less than 100us when not using it. I am
> going to test your patch, and to disable debugging and tracing... I'll
> let you know the results.

Is it better or worse with nohz=off? And do you get the backtrace?

> Thanks again,
> Luca

Sebastian



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux