Re: i7 vs Atom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 23/05/18 18:14, Ran Shalit wrote:
>
>
> בתאריך יום ד׳, 23 במאי 2018, 07:19, מאת Seokhee Han ‏<seokhee.han@xxxxxxx <mailto:seokhee.han@xxxxxxx>>:
>
>     Hi,
>
>
>     On 23/05/18 06:17, Ran Shalit wrote:
>     > Hello,
>     >
>     > We are using same BSP , kernel 3.18.11 rt7, with 2 different hardwares:
>     > 1. kontron board - i7 cpu
>     > 2. portwell board. - atom cpu (E3845 )
>     > The results are totally different with the same testing.
>     >
>     > In kontron the error is 11usec, while in portwell it is 2000usec .
>     >
>     > The results of portwell seems more than just bad - they same
>     > unbelievable, the error is VERY high (2msec).
>     >
>     > I've tried to find a benchmark which can support my results, but found
>     > no benchmark with ATOM.
>     I am now developing RT Linux system on minnowboard Turbot Quad Core board,
>     which adopts ATOM E3845 series SoC, and it shows above about 2ms worst-case
>     latency during cyclictest. So I try to detect SMI-related, kernel unaware,
>     hw latency using Linux kernel's hwlat tracer and it tells me that there are
>     couples of latency spikes (above 1000us) on the board.
>
>
>
> Hi Han,
>
> I see the 1.5 to 2 msec values every time I execute this test application
> https://github.com/nma/preempt-rt/blob/master/test-rt.c
> Can you please tell me if you get similiar results with this test application?
>
> Thanks
> Ran
>
>


Hi Ran,

I've also got the similar results (under 3ms spikes) with test-rt.c on minnowboard.

Thanks,
Seokhee


>
>     I think that most of them are SMI-related. However, because I am not familiar
>     with intel system, I could not find the right way yet to disable SMI. Morever,
>     as googling, disabling SMI on the intel system can make the system harmful,
>     because some actions with SMI are related with critical conditions of the system,
>     like critical thermal conditions.
>
>     As you can see in the below link, you can also detect hw latency with hwlat tracer.
>     https://www.osadl.org/Create-a-frequency-plot-from-data-of-har.bash-script-for-hwlat-plots.0.html
>
>     Seokhee
>     > Thank you for any suggestion.
>     >
>     > Ranran
>     > --
>     > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
>     > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>     >
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux