Re: [ANNOUNCE] 4.1.42-rt50

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:30:28AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-08-16 15:42:28 [-0500], Julia Cartwright wrote:
[..]
> > diff --git a/kernel/cpu_pm.c b/kernel/cpu_pm.c
> > index 9656a3c36503..9da42f83ee03 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cpu_pm.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cpu_pm.c
> > @@ -22,14 +22,13 @@
> >  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> >  #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
> >  
> > -static DEFINE_RWLOCK(cpu_pm_notifier_lock);
> > -static RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_pm_notifier_chain);
> > +static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_pm_notifier_chain);
> >  
> >  static int cpu_pm_notify(enum cpu_pm_event event, int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls)
> >  {
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	ret = __raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_pm_notifier_chain, event, NULL,
> > +	ret = __atomic_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_pm_notifier_chain, event, NULL,
> >  		nr_to_call, nr_calls);
> 
> there is a piece missing, upstream has a different change queued. I know
> that this is the same as in latest RT, this is just to let you know in
> case someone complains about an RCU backtrace???

Ah!  Thanks. Indeed.  I did see the upstream-queued version get cc'd to
linux-rt-users, but didn't see the rcu_irq_{enter,exit}_irqson()
addition, assuming it to be what landed in rt-devel.

Will you be fixing this up in 4.11-rt?

   Julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux