On 2017-08-16 15:42:28 [-0500], Julia Cartwright wrote:
> Alex Shi (1):
> cpu_pm: replace raw_notifier to atomic_notifier
…
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu_pm.c b/kernel/cpu_pm.c
> index 9656a3c36503..9da42f83ee03 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu_pm.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu_pm.c
> @@ -22,14 +22,13 @@
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>
> -static DEFINE_RWLOCK(cpu_pm_notifier_lock);
> -static RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_pm_notifier_chain);
> +static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_pm_notifier_chain);
>
> static int cpu_pm_notify(enum cpu_pm_event event, int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - ret = __raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_pm_notifier_chain, event, NULL,
> + ret = __atomic_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_pm_notifier_chain, event, NULL,
> nr_to_call, nr_calls);
there is a piece missing, upstream has a different change queued. I know
that this is the same as in latest RT, this is just to let you know in
case someone complains about an RCU backtrace…
> return notifier_to_errno(ret);
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
