On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Daniel Vacek wrote: > I believe Daniel's patches are the best thing we can do in current > situation as the behavior now seems rather buggy and does not provide above > mentioned expectations set when rt throttling was merged with default > budget of 95% of CPU time. Nor if you configure so that it does (by > disabling RT_RUNTIME_SHARE), it also forces CPUs to go idle needlessly when > there still can be rt task running not really starving anyone. At least > till a proper rework of rt scheduling with DL Server is implemented. This looks like a fix for a bug and the company I work for is suffering as a result. Could we please merge that ASAP? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
