On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, John Kacur wrote: > > =================================================================== > > --- rt-tests.orig/src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c > > +++ rt-tests/src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c > > @@ -1289,9 +1289,9 @@ static void process_options (int argc, c > > > I fixed your patch manually, but you are doing something wrong generating > it, see how the function header get's cut off above there? No. This is entirely correct. diff cuts off the function declaration at some random column and it's completely irrelevant to the correctness of the patch. That line is merily an extra for navigation purpose and not at all relevant to the patch itself. @@ -1289,9 +1289,9 @@ would be a completly sufficient header for the hunk. The reason why this patch did not apply is, that it is a complete replacement of the original patch and not a delta patch. Anna-Maria should have sent a new series(PATCH V2) instead of patches which can be mistaken as delta fixes. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
