On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 19:15 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Mike Galbraith | 2015-03-21 19:02:23 [+0100]: > > >> Steve, I'm still working on the fix we discussed using dummy irq_task. > >> I should be able to submit some time next week, if still interested. > >> > >> Either that, or I think we should remove the function > >> spin_do_trylock_in_interrupt() to prevent any possibility of running > >> into similar problems in the future. > > > >Why can't we just Let swapper be the owner when in irq with no dummy? > > so you abuse the owner to be swapper and mask it out everywhere. It does > not look like a final solution. I'm more inclined to take you other > patch. In the end I hope we get a timer re-work and do not need any > hackary around it… Yeah, it was just _a_ way to dodge the bullet. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
