On 03/19/2015 10:26 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:17:09 +0100 > Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> (aw crap, let's go shopping)... so why is the one in timer.c ok? > > It's not. Sebastian, you said there were no other cases of rt_mutexes > being taken in hard irq context. Looks like timer.c has one. > > So perhaps the real fix is to get that special case of ownership in > hard interrupt context? > > -- Steve > Steve, I'm still working on the fix we discussed using dummy irq_task. I should be able to submit some time next week, if still interested. Either that, or I think we should remove the function spin_do_trylock_in_interrupt() to prevent any possibility of running into similar problems in the future. Thanks, Mak. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
