* Peter Zijlstra | 2015-01-21 16:07:16 [+0100]: >On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 01:16:13PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> I'm actually wondering if we should just nuke the _interruptible() >> version of swait. As it should only be all interruptible or all not >> interruptible, that the swait_wake() should just do the wake up >> regardless. In which case, swait_wake() is good enough. No need to have >> different versions where people may think do something special. >> >> Peter? > >Yeah, I think the lastest thing I have sitting here on my disk only has >the swake_up() which does TASK_NORMAL, no choice there. what is the swait status in terms of mainline? This sounds like it beeing worked on. I could take the series but then I would drop it again if the mainline implementation changes… Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
