On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 01:16:13PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I'm actually wondering if we should just nuke the _interruptible() > version of swait. As it should only be all interruptible or all not > interruptible, that the swait_wake() should just do the wake up > regardless. In which case, swait_wake() is good enough. No need to have > different versions where people may think do something special. > > Peter? Yeah, I think the lastest thing I have sitting here on my disk only has the swake_up() which does TASK_NORMAL, no choice there. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
