Re: kernel-rt rcuc lock contention problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 19:02:29 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am worried about two things:
> 
> 1) Something calling raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ) and lack of 
> Paul's d550e81dc0dd.
> 
> The result is __run_timers checking all timer wheel "nodes" 
> and updating base->timer_jiffies, latency is ruined.
> 
> Even if one carefully made sure no timer is present.
> 
> 2) Reliance on sched timer interrupt to raise timer softirq 
> in case of pending irq work (your patch) AND no_hz_full.
> 
> > Isolation is the *only* way to make that work.
> 
> Fine. Please see item 1) above.
> 

So basically you are saying we just need: d550e81dc0dd ?

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux