Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: don't try to balance rt_runtime when it is futile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 06:24:36PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:53:24AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:53:52PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

[ . . . ]

> > > We'll probably extend it that way in the future. But likely not in a near future.
> > 
> > My guess is that Mike would be OK with making nohz_full choice of CPUs
> > still at boot time, but that he would like the CPUs that are not to be
> > in nohz_full state be able to opt out of the context-tracking overhead.
> 
> Ok that might be possible. Although still require a bit of complication.
> Lets wait for Mike input.

Sounds good!

Mike, would this do what you need?

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux