Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: don't try to balance rt_runtime when it is futile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2014-05-17 at 22:20 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> If you are saying that turning on nohz_full doesn't help unless you
> also ensure that there is only one runnable task per CPU, I completely
> agree.  If you are saying something else, you lost me.  ;-)

Yup, that's it more or less.  It's not only single task loads that could
benefit from better isolation, but if isolation improving measures are
tied to nohz_full, other sensitive loads will suffer if they try to use
isolation improvements.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux