* Mike Galbraith | 2013-12-25 18:37:37 [+0100]: >On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 23:55 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 04:07:34AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > >Having sufficiently recovered from turkey overdose to be able to slither >upstairs (bump bump bump) to check on the box, commenting.. > ># timers-do-not-raise-softirq-unconditionally.patch ># rtmutex-use-a-trylock-for-waiter-lock-in-trylock.patch > >..those two out does seem to have stabilized the thing. timers-do-not-raise-softirq-unconditionally.patch is on its way out. rtmutex-use-a-trylock-for-waiter-lock-in-trylock.patch confues me. Didn't you report once that your box deadlocks without this patch? Now your 64way box on the other hand does not work with it? >Merry Christmasss, > >-Mike Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
