On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 23:55 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 04:07:34AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > So which code do you think deserves the big lump of coal? ;-) > > > > Sebastian's NO_HZ_FULL locking fixes. Locking is hard, and rt sure > > doesn't make it any easier, so lets give him a cookie or three to nibble > > on while he ponders that trylock stuff again instead :) > > Fair enough. Does Sebastian prefer milk and cookies or the other > tradition of beer and a cigar? ;-) Having sufficiently recovered from turkey overdose to be able to slither upstairs (bump bump bump) to check on the box, commenting.. # timers-do-not-raise-softirq-unconditionally.patch # rtmutex-use-a-trylock-for-waiter-lock-in-trylock.patch ..those two out does seem to have stabilized the thing. Merry Christmasss, -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
