On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 09:16 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -1129,11 +1127,8 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state)
>>> * is actually now running somewhere else!
>>> */
>>> while (task_running(rq, p)) {
>>> - if (match_state) {
>>> - if (!unlikely(check_task_state(p, match_state)))
>>> - return 0;
>>> + if (match_state && !check_task_state(p, match_state))
>>
>> Ah, it was that "!unlikely(" that caused me to miss the '!'. That
>> should have been: likely(!check_task_state()). But anyway, I rather
>> just keep what you wrote and drop the unlikely altogether.
>
> Maybe better would be to put the thing back inline, with a brief
> reference to the race.
There is similar code in
- task_is_stopped_or_traced()
- task_is_traced()
and I didn't get around to have one function for this stupid check
since the check is always a little different.
> -Mike
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
