Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Nebojša Ćosić wrote: >> I have to repeat that the code in question worked in my case, which is >> very specific, and that reason for discussing it is to try to come to a >> proper solution to this problem. >> And yes, I do believe that, even if behaviour is documented, it is still >> a problem and can be dealt with in a better way. > I have to repeat what the real problem is: It's also not possible to solve problems of the x86 based hardware by kernel patches :) Is the problem a mirage created by "SMI" ? Running EtherCAT stable with SMI based delays of ~200-400 us is just an illusion ... --Armin > > You are not understanding at all how networking, queueing, traffic > control and other advanced concepts are working. You are not even > trying it. > > You just insist that your view of the problem is correct and there > must be a magic technical solution to it. > > Again, there is no technical solution to cure ignorance. > > Thanks, > > tglx > > > > > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
